Legal Opinion

State v. Madonda

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2016No. 34,667PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VIGIL, Justice.

{1} Defendant Muziwokuthula Madonda (Defendant) was interrogated following his arrest for the murders of two men in Tucumcari, New Mexico. At the outset of the interrogation, law enforcement officers advised Defendant of his Miranda rights, and he unequivocally invoked his right to remain silent and his right to counsel. However, the officers continued to interrogate Defendant, and Defendant eventually made incriminating statements. Defendant then moved pretrial to have the statements suppressed, arguing that they were obtained in violation of the prophylactic rules…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MaresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2023
  2. State v. McDowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. AlvaradoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. MadondaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API