Legal Opinion

State v. Thaut

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2004No. 02-460PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner

¶1 Gaiy James Thaut (“Thaut”) appeals from a supplemental order entered May 3, 2001, in the District Court for the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County. Thaut was originally ordered to pay $440,107 in restitution. This amount was reduced to $69,457 by a supplemental order from which he appeals. We affirm.

¶2 We address the following issues raised by Thaut on appeal:

¶3 1. Are the restitution statutes, as amended by the 2003 Legislature, House Bill 220, unconstitutional?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in fixing the amount of Thaut’s restitution?

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶5 On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. PritchettMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. KennedyMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. KrantzMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. FarrellMontana Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EllisMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. HoltMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. RytkyMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. ShepardMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. HoltMontana Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API