Legal Opinion

Cochrane v. Zuppann

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1950No. 236PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Vincent Cochrane, a military prisoner, contains approximately twenty-two paragraphs of alleged error in his court-martial proceeding. The entire problem, however, revolves about his allegation that at the time of the commission of the offense he was insane and that the “Court Martial Board” failed to refer the question to a “Medical Board.” This was the question presented at the hearing. Other phases such as actions of the investigating officer and appointing authority need not be discussed. They are fully covered,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Humphrey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Schilder v. GusikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  4. Massey v. HumphreyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Smith v. HumphreyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richards v. CoxDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API