Legal Opinion

Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Baldridge

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1934No. 899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Appellee, as the named beneficiary in an accident insurance policy, instituted this suit. She attached a copy of the policy and the application for it, which was made a part of it, to her complaint and by reference made them a part thereof. The policy was issued by appellant, a Nebraska corporation, as insurer, to her brother, as insured, on July 1, 1927, on his said application therefor wherein he named appellee, his sister, as beneficiary and stated therein her address to be Eaton, Colorado. The policy was made and delivered to the insured at Casper, Wyoming, where he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. London Assurance v. Companhia De Moagens Do BarreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Coghlan v. South Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Cox and Dick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. HaackDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1943
  2. Lawrence Nat. Bank v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Michael v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Lawrence Nat. Bank v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API