Legal Opinion

Asbury v. Germania Bank

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 1, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-1818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GESELL, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are numerous motions: one motion to dismiss by one of the many defendants, two motions to withdraw as counsel, three motions for extension of time, eight motions for admission of counsel pro hac vice, one motion for leave to file a sur-response, and, finally, one motion by the plaintiffs to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. The last of these motions, strenuously opposed by defendants, has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision.

This is one of the many common law and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Piekarski v. Home Owners Savings BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Westgate Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Kirby v. Mercury Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  3. Resolution Trust Corporation v. Westgate Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. United Savings Bank v. RoseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. SloanDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API