Legal Opinion

Roper Ex Rel. Roper v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1960No. 2609PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant, a young girl, through her father as next friend, sued the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company for an allegedly slanderous statement made by one of its store managers. At the close of her case the trial court granted A & P’s motion for a directed verdict on the ground that the manager’s words were not slanderous per se and no pecuniary damage had been proved.

The evidence was that one evening plaintiff went with her father, mother and grandmother to an A & P store where the family had traded for over two years. As the family shopped, plaintiff, who was then…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Munden v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Sawyer v. . Gilmers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Harmon v. LissDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Sawyer v. Gilmers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farnum v. ColbertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Zapata v. Woodward & LothropDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API