Cream of Wheat Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TRIEBER, District Judge.
The evidence before the Federal Trade Commission was quite voluminous and conflicting. Section 5 of the act creating the Commission (38 Stat. 719 [Comp. St. § 8836e]) made the findings of the Commission on conflicting evidence conclusive. There being substantial evidence to warrant the findings made, we are only concerned with the question whether the order of the Commission on th'e findings is authorized by the statute.
The findings of facts, so far as material .'.to the issues, are:
“(4) Respondent employs no traveling salesmen. Respondent has, at certain localities in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. A. Schrader's Son, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Frey & Son, Inc. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Arkansas Wholesale Grocers' Ass'n v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Harriet Hubbard Ayer, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- J. W. Kobi Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- American Chain & Cable Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.