Legal Opinion

Sprung v. Halberstam

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 8, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Issues were presented in respect of the alleged payment by defendant and whether or not there was in fact an accord and satisfaction. Moreover, the prohibition of section. 347 of the Civil Practice Act applies to evidence in affidavits on a motion for. summary judgment as well as to testimony upon a trial (Ditkoff v. Prudential Sav. Bank, 245 App. Div. 748). But it has been held that on a motion for summary judgment, matter which might be excluded on a trial pursuant to section 347 of the Civil Practice Act may nonetheless be considered in determining whether a triable issue exists to defeat…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ditkoff v. Prudential Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Joseph Kantor & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Lindner v. EichelNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API