Legal Opinion

United States v. Larry Flynt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1985No. 84-5041PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion in this case, filed March 28, 1985, 756 F.2d 1352, is hereby amended. The second paragraph of footnote 13 shall be deleted and replaced with the following paragraph:

In addition, we note that had proper procedures been followed, the plenary adjudication of Flynt’s contempt charges would have taken place before another judge since Flynt’s remarks constituted highly personal derogatory attacks leveled at Judge Real. Where plenary adjudication is appropriate, and where the alleged contempt has in it the element of personal attack, due process ordinarily requires that the defendant be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. Larry FlyntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Joe Lowell McElyea Jr. v. Governor Bruce BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Danjaq LLC v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jario A. MEJIA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Torres-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API