Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dr. v. J. Devine, and Cross-Appellee v. James S. Patteson, Jr., and Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1957No. 12878_1Published

1DissentMiller, Circuit Judge

I am in agreement with the statement in the majority opinion of the general rule that under certain conditions where the issue of damages is entirely separate from the issue of liability, a new trial may be granted limited to the issue of damages only. This Court has so held. Thompson v. Camp, 6 Cir., 167 F.2d 733. But as stated in that case, the court should proceed with caution, with a careful regard for the rights of both parties, and only in those cases where it is plain that the error which has crept into one element of the verdict did not in any way affect the determination of any other…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Neese v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API