Legal Opinion

A. Johnson & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 10, 1978No. C.D. 4737; Court Nos. 70/19276, etcPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson, Judge:

The merchandise in this case, described as Mairon Electrolytic Iron Cathode Plate or Mairon Electrolytic Iron Flake, was heretofore the subject of decision after trial in C.D. 4650 wherein this court held the merchandise to be classifiable as claimed under TSUS item 415.50 as modified by T.D. 68-9 as chemical elements in any physical form at the duty rate of 7 or 8 per centum ad valorem, depending upon date of entry, and not, as returned in the liquidation, under TSUS item 657.20 as modified by T.D. 68-9 as articles of iron not coated or plated with precious metal at the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. A. Johnson & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. Oak Laminates Division of Oak Materials Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  3. Bar Zel Expediters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API