State v. Coyle
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
Tenney, J., orally.
— This was a prosecution for a violation of the statute regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors. In the District Court, a motion was made in arrest of judgment on the ground that no seal was affixed to the original warrant.
The complaint and warrant were in the common form. There was a seal at the right of the Justice’s name on the complaint, but not on the margin of the warrant, if they should be separated by a straight line.
No seal is required on a complaint, nor does the complaint in this case, by any of its language, show that there was any intention that a seal…
2Cited by3 opinions
- DeGraw v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Osgood v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- State v. HainesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958