Legal Opinion

State v. Coyle

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tenney, J., orally.

— This was a prosecution for a violation of the statute regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors. In the District Court, a motion was made in arrest of judgment on the ground that no seal was affixed to the original warrant.

The complaint and warrant were in the common form. There was a seal at the right of the Justice’s name on the complaint, but not on the margin of the warrant, if they should be separated by a straight line.

No seal is required on a complaint, nor does the complaint in this case, by any of its language, show that there was any intention that a seal…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeGraw v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Osgood v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. State v. HainesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API