Legal Opinion

Anita Miller and Adam Hicks, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. InSinkErator, LLC

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 7, 2026No. 1:23-cv-03797Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ANITA MILLER and ADAM HICKS, on be- half of themselves and all others similarly situated, NO. 1:23-CV-03797 Plaintiffs, Judge Edmond E. Chang v. INSINKERATOR, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Anita Miller and Adam Hicks allege that InSinkErator, LLC, manufactured and sold defective garbage-disposal models, and they seek to represent a class of sim- ilarly affected consumers.1 See generally R. 12, First Am. Compl.2 Discovery has closed, and the Plaintiffs now move to amend their complaint under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Aaron McCoy v. Iberdrola Renewables, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Chessie Logistics Company, LLC v. Krinos Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Arnold Chapman v. First Index, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API