Legal Opinion · Dissent

Avemco Insurance v. Auburn Flying Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 13, 2001No. 00-1646Published

1DissentLay, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

Under the circumstances, I respectfully submit that the result reached by the majority constitutes a gross miscarriage of justice for the families of those passengers who were killed and for the decedent owner and operator of the small plane involved. Under the doctrine of reasonable expectation, it is absurd to think that the owner of the plane did not contemplate full insurance coverage for his non-commercial flights.13 The owner lost money on the flights in question each time he flew and the facts stipulated clearly show that he did not have a commercial purpose in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Rathbun v. Globe Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. American Family Insurance Group v. HemenwayNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Plambeck v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API