Legal Opinion
Love, Rosemary v. Johanns, Michael
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 3, 2006No. 04-5449, 05-5084PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge.
Rosemary Love and nine other female farmers appeal from the denial of their motion for class certification. Appellants claim, on behalf of themselves’ and “not less than 3,000” similarly situated women, that the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA” or “the Department”) discriminatorily administered its lending programs, and that the Department failed to process and properly inves tigate women’s discrimination complaints over the last quarter-century. Because we conclude the District Court did not abuse…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Bazemore v. FridaySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marc E. Bacon v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Garcia v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Richards, Constance v. Delta Airln IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Garcia, Guadalupe L. v. Johanns, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Taylor v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- M.D. v. PerryDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.