Legal Opinion · Dissent

Genen v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1999Published

1Dissent

Andrias and Saxe, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Andrias, J., as follows: We differ with the majority solely on the issue of whether defendant-appellant, Hunter Excavating Corp., can be held directly liable for plaintiff’s personal injuries based upon its alleged negligent performance of its snow removal contract with Metro-North.

Hunter was responsible for snow removal and sanding at the station pursuant to a written agreement with Metro-North. Such contract required Hunter to commence snow removal or *216sanding work as soon as possible, but in any event within one hour, after being notified by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Palka v. Servicemaster Management Services Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Eaves Brooks Costume Co. v. Y.B.H. Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Phillips v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Glick v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API