Legal Opinion

Sue F. George v. New York Life Insurance Company, a Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1965No. 20067Published

1Per curiam

In this action at law, tried to the court sitting without a jury, the district court made findings in favor of the defendant and entered judgment accordingly. Upon this appeal the contention is that the findings are clearly erroneous and that there was sufficient evidence to establish the claim of the plaintiff.

We have examined the record with care and the contentions of the appellant with respect thereto and we are forced to the conclusion that the findings are supported by the evidence, that they are not clearly erroneous, and that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed.

It is so…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Joseph J. Mulhern, Sr., of the Estate of Robert M. Carroll, Deceased v. Capital Airlines, Inc., and United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API