State v. Elbert

Appellant was convicted of sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo 1986, and sexual abuse in the first degree, § 566.100, RSMo 1986. He received concurrent sentences of ten years and five years, respectively. He now appeals, claiming that the trial court erred in precluding testimony that appellant did not fit the psychological profile of a sex offender.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Appellant and his wife provided babysitting services for the four-year-old victim, A.B., and a number of other children. A.B.’s mother suspected that A.B. may have been sexually abused by appellant, and on April 26,…