Legal Opinion

Sonoco Products Co. v. Ace Ina Insurance

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided July 11, 2012No. Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-02366-RBHPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Sonoco Products Company (“Sonoco Products”) and Sonoco Canada Corporation (“Sonoco Canada”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this lawsuit alleging that Defendants, various insurance companies, failed to insure Plaintiffs for a loss covered under two separate polices. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, which seeks the dismissal of Defendant ACE INA Insurance (“ACE INA”) under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(5), and seeks the dismissal of the entire action pursuant to the doctrine of forum, non…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gourdine v. Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  2. Hutton v. Hydra-Tech, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  3. Red Hill Ranch, LLC v. Old South Carriage Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  4. E.E. ex rel. Epsey v. Eagle's Nest FoundationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  5. Agracel Inc v. STS Group North America IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API