Legal Opinion

Bernick v. City of Little Falls

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 2, 1934No. 29,792PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 253 N.W. 369. Action by the plaintiff to restrain the defendant city of Little Falls and its officers from enforcing as to him an ordinance of the city regulating the sale of nonintoxicating liquor and requiring vendors to obtain a license. The defendants appeal from an order overruling their demurrer to the complaint.

The plaintiff is a wholesaler of soft drinks and of nonintoxicating malt beverages of not more than one-half of one per cent by volume and not more than three and two-tenths per cent alcoholic content by weight. His plant is at St. Cloud, where he is duly licensed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bernick v. City of Little FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. State v. IvesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. Cleveland v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API