Legal Opinion

Greenwood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1925No. 8926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Conviction is for conveying into jail an implement useful in aiding a prisoner to escape. Punishment is two years in the penitentiary.

Our State’s attorney suggests that the statement of facts should not he considered because of delayed filing, relying upon Holden v. State, 267 S. W. Rep. 275. The trial term continued for more than eight weeks. Sentence was pronounced on February 25th. This was the final judgment. Article 845, C. C. P., reads in part:

"Provided, if the term of said court may by law continue for more than eight weeks, said statement of facts and bills of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Castelberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Salter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Holden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Metaxes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Holland and Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API