Legal Opinion

Martell v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 29, 1981No. 51,544PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woleslagel, J.:

This case was filed after defendant landowners refused to let the plaintiff remove ballast that had been used on a railroad right-of-way. The plaintiff claimed ownership of the ballast as the final assignee of removal and entitlement rights by purchase from the railroad company. The defendants claimed ownership under the law of abandoned railroad property, as they became reversionary owners of the land upon abandonment of the right-of-way.

After court trial, the trial judge decided ownership to be in the plaintiff and he granted the parties the privilege of agreeing on a proper…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Council Grove v. OssmannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. People v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Pratt v. GrieseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anna F. Nordhus Family Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Gauger v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Miller v. St. Louis, Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Swaby v. Northern Hills Regional Railroad AuthoritySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Bitner v. Watco Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API