Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Patricia Sweatt and Arthur Sweatt

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 27, 2017No. 2016-0296PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

The respondent, Arthur Sweatt, appeals orders of the Circuit Court ( Lemire , J.) denying, in relevant part, the respondent's motions to reconsider certain orders in his divorce from Patricia Sweatt. He argues the court erred: (1) in denying his motion to abate the divorce; (2) in granting the motion of petitioner Kathleen Paine, administrator of the estate of Patricia Sweatt, to amend by substitution; (3) in distributing the marital property more than six months after the dissolution of the marriage; (4) in finding him, but not Paine, to have been non-compliant with court rules; (5) by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. Bean v. Red Oak Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. Keshishian v. CMC RadiologistsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. Giles v. GilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. Germain v. GermainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Appeal of Sandra Brown, DVMSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API