Graczyk v. State

The appellant contends that the lower court, which tried the case sitting without a jury, erred in refusing to grant his mo'tions for-judgment of ácquittal, claiming that the evidence was ' insufficient to sustain a verdict of guilty.

This Court has repeatedly stated that our function in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence on an appeal from a conviction 'in' a non-jury criminal case is not whether we might have reached a different result from that of the trial court, but whether the court below had sufficient evidence from which it could be fairly'convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of…