Legal Opinion
Pursifull v. Eakin
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1987No. Nos. 84-2127, 84-2128PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.8(c). The cause, therefore, is submitted without oral argument.
Cases 84-2127 and 84-2128 have been consolidated on appeal for purposes of record, briefing, argument and submission. Each appeal stems from an adversary proceeding filed in conjunction with the bankruptcy case involving Larry L. Sharp, debt- or (Sharp). Due to the similarity…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Castlerock Properties, Debtor. Piombo Corporation, a California Corporation v. Castlerock Properties, a California Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Browning v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- John N. Fortier and Linda M. Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, James A. Peterson, Peterson Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Kelley v. NodineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Personette v. Kennedy (In Re Midgard Corp.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Christensen v. Tucson Estates, Inc. (In re Tucson Estates, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co. v. Holly's, Inc. (In Re Holly's, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1992
- Busch v. Busch (In Re Busch)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Franklin Savings Ass'n v. Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.