Marsh v. South Carolina Railroad
Supreme Court of Georgia
Railroads. Principal and agent. Presumptions. Evidence. Witness. Practice in the Superior Court. Before Judge Tompkins. Richmond Superior Court. April Term, 1875. Reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Judge.
A wife sued a railroad company for the homicide of her husband, who was run over and killed by a train while he was engaged in uncoupling the cars. He was an employee of the company; and another employee, one Butler Addison, was present and witnessed the occurrence. Previous to the trial, the plaintiff’s counsel had made some effort to obtain an interview with Addison for' the purpose of learning the facts and ascertaining what he would testify, and had been prevented from so doing by the interposition of the company’s local agent. Addison, it seems, had made a statement of…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Doyal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Krogg v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Central Railroad v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Hollenbeck v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Baker v. Lowe Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.