Legal Opinion
Yuzwak v. Dygert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1988PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special *939Term erred by granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ causes of action for breach of warranty and fraud. We modify the order to reinstate these causes of action.
In October 1985, defendants Barbara and Robert Dygert, doing business as Dygert Equine Services, consigned a horse named "Handy Deposit” to defendant Bucknam Horse Sales for sale at an auction. A brochure distributed to auction participants contained biographical information…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Opera v. Hyva, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Key v. BagenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Levin v. Dalva Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Shema Kolainu-Hear Our Voices v. Providersoft, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Schlaifer Nance & Co., Inc. v. Estate of WarholDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.