Legal Opinion
Dean v. City of Bay City
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 15, 2007No. 06-1192, 06-1657UnpublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge.
The Plaintiffs-Appellants, Eric Carlyle Dean and Elizabeth Dean, filed a civil rights complaint against the defendants alleging constitutional violations and various state law claims based upon the alleged wrongful termination of Eric Dean’s employment. After the filing of the defendants’ motions for summary judgment, the Deans sought to amend their Complaint to assert additional claims, including a claim under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (hereinafter the “ADA”). The district court subsequently granted the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- William Singfield v. Akron Metropolitan Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Whitfield v. TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Conn v. DeskinsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017
- Barber v. FrakesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2022
- Bradley v. TerrisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Brown v. BrownDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.