Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 2006No. A06A0211PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Michael Saul Goldberg appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial following his conviction of burglary, arguing that the trial court erred by (1) denying his Batson 1 motion, (2) refusing to charge the jury on theft by taking, and (3) sentencing him under the general recidivist statute, OCGA § 17-10-7 (a), instead of the more specific burglary statute, OCGA § 16-7-1 (b). We affirm.

1. Goldberg first assigns error to the denial of his Batson motion to reseat African-American jurors struck by the state, arguing that the trial court erred in ruling that he failed to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Braley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  5. Lingo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. HARVEY v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. Patrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Heath Douglas Partlow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  5. Robert Anthony Clayton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API