Legal Opinion

A. B. v. C.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert F. Doran, J.

Although the caption on the front sheet of the order to show cause designates the parties as plaintiff and defendants, the balance of the papers would indicate that the proper designation should be petitioner and respondents and that this matter is in the nature of some kind of special proceeding. The affidavit of petitioner contains no caption, and the affidavit of petitioner’s attorney designates the matter as “In an Application to Establish the Competency of A. B.”

The papers indicate that petitioner seeks a determination pursuant to the equitable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Eichner v. DillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Erickson v. DilgardNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In re MelideoNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Anderson v. Raleigh Fitkin-Paul Morgan Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. HarmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Saunders v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Winthrop University Hospital v. HessNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. HarmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API