Legal Opinion

Distributors Import Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 7, 1973No. C.R.D. 73-35; Court No. R67/9550PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Newman, Judge:

Defendant has moved to strike the complaint in this action “pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4.7 (b) ”. The predicate *299of defendant’s motion to strike is that “the Court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter with respect to the merchandise identified in paragraph 4 of said complaint”.

Initially, it should be pointed out that rule 4.7 (b) does not provide for a motion to strike the complaint, but rather for a motion to dismiss the action.1 However, rule 4.7 (e) provides for a motion to strike, but not upon the ground urged by defendant — lack of jurisdiction of the subject…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. International Packers, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Superscope, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Nadel & Sons Toy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API