Legal Opinion

Mega Personal Lines, Inc. v. Halton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 1, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Lahtinen, J.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5239 seeking a determination that certain property executed upon by respondents Robert L. Halton and Diane Halton (hereinafter collectively referred to as respondents) to partially satisfy a judgment that respondents held against Mega Group, Inc. was, in fact, property of petitioner and not Mega Group. Respondents moved to dismiss the petition asserting that the transaction in which Mega Group purported to transfer its assets to petitioner was fraudulent. Finding that respondents *429had effectively moved for summary judgment and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barker v. KallashNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In re Port of New York AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Jones v. MarcyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Blakeslee v. RabinorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Mega Group, Inc. v. HaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mega Personal Lines, Inc. v. HaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Mega Group, Inc. v. Pechenik & Curro, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API