United States v. Frank R. Coppola
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Subsequent to the argument and decision of this case by the original panel, the United States petitioned for a rehearing en banc as to the defendant, Frank R. Coppola. 28 U.S.C.A. § 46(c). Because of the importance of the question involved, the petition was granted and a second argument was heard by all the active judges of the court.
The defendant, Frank R. Coppola, was convicted, after a trial by jury in the Western District of New York, on all three counts of an indictment charging violations of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a) and (b). The first count alleged that defendant on or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gambino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. Robert William Gorman and Edward Terrence RocheCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Gordon R. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- David R. Jones v. United States of America, Willie L. Short, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur L. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.