Legal Opinion

Bayley v. Taber

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 15, 1809PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The declaration in this action contained thirty-seven counts upon as many promissory notes, alleged to have been made by the defendants, each under five dollars, payable to bearer on demand, for value received, and bearing date between the third day of October and the thirtieth day of December, 1804.

1Opinion of the Court

Afterwards, at an adjournment of the March term, in the county of Suffolk, holden in July following, the opinion of the Court was delivered as follows, by

Parker, J.

This cause was tried before me at the sittings after the last law term, in Cumberland, in May last; and I then inclined to the opinion, that the defendants should not be permitted to allege a *223falsity in an instrument made and signed by themselves, and which had by them been put into general circulation as money. Notes of this description, under the denomination of Taber’s notes, to a large amount, having become a common currency in…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Young v. Clarendon TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Towne v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Coler v. CleburneSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Moore v. SmeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Whetstone v. Bank at MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API