Legal Opinion

Ackley v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 6, 1905No. 23982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The Reporters'1 statement of the case: The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPeelle, J.

The claimant, a commander in the United States Navy on the retired list since October 25, 1901, seeks to recover the difference between the shore pay, which he received, and the sea pay of his grade from June 5 to September 8,1899, under the following state of facts:

March 17, 1899, the claimant was, by order of the Secretary of the Navy, detached from duty as secretary of the Light-House Board, Treasury Department, Washington, D. C., as well as from such other duties as may have been assigned to him, and was ordered to “ report to the commander in chief of the Asiatic Station for the command…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farenholt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API