Legal Opinion

Arvinas Operations, Inc. v. Qian

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 20, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00717Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ARVINAS OPERATIONS, INC., ARVINAS 3:22-CV-00717-RNC ANDROGEN RECEPTOR, INC., ARVINAS ESTROGEN RECEPTOR, INC., Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants, vs. November 20, 2024 YIMIN QIAN, ACCUTAR BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AND COMPEL (ECF NO. 235) In this action, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Arvinas Operations, Inc., Arvinas Androgen Receptor, Inc., and Arvinas Estrogen Receptor, Inc. (collectively, “Arvinas”) accuse Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Accutar…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DeRubeis v. Witten Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  2. Big Vision Private Limited v. E.I. Du Pont Nemours and Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. Vesta Corp. v. Amdocs Management Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  4. Loop AI Labs Inc. v. GattiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API