Legal Opinion
Cortland v. Columbia Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1995Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Phillip R. Rumsey, J.
The above-captioned insurance coverage action was brought by Monarch Cortland, a Division of Monarch Machine Tool Company, Inc. (Monarch) against its comprehensive insurance carrier, Columbia Casualty Company (Columbia).
Monarch was insured by Columbia under a commercial casualty policy providing comprehensive general liability coverage with policy limits of $1,000,000 for bodily injury or property damage (the insurance policy). Monarch was also insured by Allianz Underwriters Insurance Company (Allianz) under an umbrella liability policy with policy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Turner Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sherman v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Maurice Goldman & Sons, Inc. v. Hanover InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Milbrandt v. A.P. Green Refractories Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.