Legal Opinion

Gregory Martinez Reinoza v. Warden, California City Immigration Processing Center

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 21, 2026No. 1:26-cv-06245Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY MARTINEZ REINOZA (A# No. 1:26-cv-06245 DAD SCR 240-910-304), 12 Petitioner, 13 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS v. 14 WARDEN, CALIFORNIA CITY 15 IMMIGRATION PROCESSING CENTER, 16 Respondent. 17 18 Petitioner is a federal immigration detainee proceeding through counsel with a habeas 19 corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 22 I. Factual…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API