Daily v. City of Columbus Board of Zoning Appeals
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
KIRSCH, Judge.
Jim and Carol Daily ("the Dailys") have petitioned for rehearing from our opinion in this case, reported as Daily v. City of Columbus Board of Zoning Appeals, 904 N.E.2d 343 (Ind.Ct.App.2009), in which we held that the City of Columbus Board of Zoning Appeals ("the BZA") and the trial court erred by finding and concluding that the 2.1-acre lot in Columbus, Indiana that the Dailys are purchasing on contract was illegally created in 1973. We grant the Dailys' petition to clarify our decision in this appeal and write to address the issue of frontage and access.
Se…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Daily v. City of Columbus Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009