South Georgia Power Co. v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Where not prohibited by law, a city may legally erect and maintain an obstruction in one of its streets, provided the obstruction is not dangerous and does not constitute an unreasonable interference with the lawful use of the street. 9 R. C. L. 1193; 13 R. C. L. 199; 26 R. C. L. 527. Where, in a city street about eighty feet wide, the city has authorized the erection and maintenance, longitudinally down the middle of the street, of a series of poles which support electrical wires, and on either side of the poles there remain driveways, each of which is about forty feet in width, and the…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Blunt v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Kicklighter v. SAVANNAH TRANSIT AUTHORITYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Callaway v. Central Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Lenderman v. HaynieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.