Legal Opinion

Spillars v. Curry

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Limestone. This case was submitted at Austin.

1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.

There are hut three grounds of error assigned by the appellants, that we believe require any notice from us — the second, third, and fourth.

The second assignment is, that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

The motion was made on the affidavit of one of the appellants that ho was taken by surprise; but he does not support his motion by showing what the absent witnesses would have sworn to if they had been present; nor does he show any reason why he did not have them in attendance. He swears that he believes that one of the witnesses sworii on the trial was mistaken, from…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hooks v. ColleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877
  3. West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877
  4. Wisson v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API