Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 24, 1915No. 9174PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Prince, J., Spartanburg, Action by John A. Harrison, as administrator of the estate of James Harrison, deceased, plaintiff, against Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, defendant. Prom judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

Before Prince, J., Spartanburg, Action by John A. Harrison, as administrator of the estate of James Harrison, deceased, plaintiff, against Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, defendant. Prom judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. cite: There was no evidence excusing deceased’s use of the gtiy wire: 85 S. C. 372. No actionable negligence operating as a proximate cause: 85 S. C. 338. Deceased violated rules of caution prescribed to govern his work: 82 S. C. 548; 70 S. C. 252; and was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law: 94 S. C.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydricic

Defendant appeals from judgment for plaintiff for $5,000.00 damages for negligence causing the death of plaintiff’s intestate, which occurred under the following-circumstances: Deceased was employed by defendant as a lineman. His duties were to do general repair and con-stru tion work which includes installing telephones, the work at which he was engaged when the accident occurred.

Defendant’s telephone wires are encased in a lead pipe, which is supported by a wire rope to which it is attached by rings pláced at intervals. The whole…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stone v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burns v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API