Melodie McFarland and Pamela Lykes v. Stacie Boisseau
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice.
Appellants, Melodie McFarland and Pamela Lykes, challenge the jury verdict determining they published statements about appellee, Stacie Boisseau, that were defamatory per se. In three issues, appellants argue (1) most of the statements were not defamatory per se and should not have been submitted to the jury; (2) the trial court erred by instructing the jury that proof of damages was not required for the statements that were not defamatory per se; and (8) the trial court erred by denying their motion for new trial after disregarding certain answers by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crown Life Insurance Company v. CasteelTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Romero v. KPH Consolidation, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
- Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. CrumpTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- One Call Systems, Inc. v. Houston Lighting & Power, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bartush-Schnitzius Foods Co. v. Cimco Refrigeration, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
- Zueger v. GossColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Cimco Refrigeration, Inc. v. Bartush-Schnitzius Foods Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
- Cimco Refrigeration, Inc. v. Bartush-Schnitzius Foods Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
- City of Fort Worth, Texas v. Print Clark, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.