Legal Opinion

Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. Barner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 16, 1994No. 93-0303PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves a dispute as to fees between an attorney and a former client after the attorney was discharged and a settlement was secured for the client by a successor attorney. We reverse and remand for reconsideration by the trial court of the *1072amount of attorney’s fees due and the method by which such fees are to be determined.

In determining fees the trial court expressly applied the decision in Boyette v. Martha White Foods, Inc., 528 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 538 So.2d 1255 (Fla.1988). Boyette held that:

1. The method set out in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. Boyette v. Martha White Foods, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Faro v. RomaniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Schwartz, Gold & Cohen, PA v. StreicherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elser v. Law Offices of James M. RussDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Barner v. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API