Legal Opinion

Stivers v. Blethen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1923No. 17719PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

— The plaintiff, W. H. Stivers, as a member of Seattle Typographical Union No. 202, brought this action for and on behalf of himself and for the use and benefit of the other members of the union. *474The defendants named in the complaint are C. B: Blethen, A. G. Bixby, George W. Jeffs, and the Times Printing Company of Seattle, a corporation; and it is sought to recover from the Times Company the sunl of $848.30. To the third amended complaint, which will be referred to as the complaint, a demurrer was interposed and sustained. The plaintiff refused to plead further and elected to stand upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connelly v. Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  2. Kelly v. Grand Circle Women of WoodcraftWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Robinson v. DahmNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hamilton v. RouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crisler v. CrumNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  2. United Union Brewing Co. v. BeckWashington Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API