Legal Opinion

In Re Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1950No. File 9161, 9169PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

In November, 1947, the Northwestern Bell Telephone Company made application to the Public Utilities Commission to increase rates for telephone exchange and intrastate toll service claiming that the rates then in effect were confiscatory and unlawful. The Company filed with its application a proposed schedule of increased rates. Presentation of testimony began on March 15, 1948, hearings were continued from time to time and on October 8, 1949, the Commission filed its report and made and entered its order denying the application. The Company appealed from such order to the Circuit Court of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D. C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Davenport Water Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  3. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. City of Norfolk v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API