Legal Opinion

City of Indianapolis v. Kahlo

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2010No. 49A05-0912-CV-722PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Clarke Kablo and Howard Elder ("Plaintiffs"), individually and as purported class representatives, filed a complaint against the City of Indianapolis ("the City"), the Metropolitan Development Commission ("the Commission"), and the Indiana Sports Corporation ("the ISC") (collectively "Defendants") seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief arising from Defendants' amendment to the 1985 Project Agreement for Private Redevelopment of Square 88 ("the 1985 Agreement") executed by the City and the ISC. Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Higgins v. HaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ross, Inc. v. LeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Schloss v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Brown v. Penn Central Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Claire's Boutiques, Inc. v. Brownsburg Station Partners LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Veolia Water Indianapolis LLC v. National Trust Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Sauter v. Perfect North Slopes, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
  4. Ardis W. Tucker, Sr. and Sandra D. Tucker v. Tom Raper, Inc. and Clarke Power Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. John S. Paniaguas, Kathy R. Paniaguas, Woodrow Cornett, III, and Kristine E. Cornett v. Endor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API