Ascension v. Saenz
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, contend that a deed was intended as a mortgage. The *267trial court held that the instrument was a deed. We must determine (1) whether appellants’ pleadings gave fair notice of the issue stated above, (2) whether their points in the brief preserved the issue, and (3) whether the proof, as a matter of law, established appellants’ contention.
Appellants, Jose Ascension and Mary Gomez Ascension, husband and wife, on January 4, 1957, entered into a written installment contract with G. W. Wilkinson by which they agreed to buy and he to sell Lot 2, Block 5,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Woodward v. OrtizTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Griffin v. Superior Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williamson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Sandoval v. RattikinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Sandoval v. RattikinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965