Legal Opinion

Ascension v. Saenz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 19, 1961No. 13799PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, contend that a deed was intended as a mortgage. The *267trial court held that the instrument was a deed. We must determine (1) whether appellants’ pleadings gave fair notice of the issue stated above, (2) whether their points in the brief preserved the issue, and (3) whether the proof, as a matter of law, established appellants’ contention.

Appellants, Jose Ascension and Mary Gomez Ascension, husband and wife, on January 4, 1957, entered into a written installment contract with G. W. Wilkinson by which they agreed to buy and he to sell Lot 2, Block 5,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Woodward v. OrtizTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Griffin v. Superior Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williamson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Sandoval v. RattikinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Sandoval v. RattikinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API