Legal Opinion

Tristan Associates v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.

Taxpayer, Tristan Radiology Specialists, P.C.,1 petitions for review of the order of the Board of Finance and Revenue (Board) denying Taxpayer’s petition for refund of sales and use taxes ($61,845.44) paid on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) machines, canned software associated therewith, and electricity to power such equipment during the period October 2006 through December 2008. The issue on appeal is whether these items are excluded from tax under the manufacturing exclusion set forth in the Tax Reform Code of 1971 (Tax Code).2

Accordin…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Sitkin's Junk Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Com. v. Olan Mills, Inc. of OhioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. TuckerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. M & M/Mars, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Northeastern Pennsylvania Imaging Center v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API