Legal Opinion
United States v. Zarintash, Shahbaz Shane A/K/A "John", United States of America v. Madelaine Wasserman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 1, 1984No. 83-5445, 83-5446PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
Madelaine Sara Wasserman and Shahbaz Shane Zarintash appeal from their convictions for conspiracy to import, possess, and distribute hashish, and possession of hashish. 1 Wasserman and Zarintash raise a number of issues, only some of which merit discussion. Zarintash contends the district court abused its discretion in refusing to reread a portion of the testimony to the jury. We agree with Zarintash, and we reverse his conviction and remand for a new trial.
Wasserman claims that the court impermissibly admitted evidence (including $32,-960 in cash)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Wright-BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Jonathan PennyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.